↓ Skip to main content

豪雨被災事例からみる医療機関における浸水被害時の初動対応と事業継続についての考察

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F6 (Safety Problem), March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
豪雨被災事例からみる医療機関における浸水被害時の初動対応と事業継続についての考察
Published in
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F6 (Safety Problem), March 2020
DOI 10.2208/jscejsp.75.2_i_217
Authors

湯浅 恭史, 中野 晋, 岡野 将希

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F6 (Safety Problem)
#14
of 15 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,091
of 391,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F6 (Safety Problem)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 109.0. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them