↓ Skip to main content

Capturing patterns of evolutionary relatedness with reflectance spectra to model and monitor biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Capturing patterns of evolutionary relatedness with reflectance spectra to model and monitor biodiversity
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2023
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2215533120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel M. Griffith, Kristin B. Byrd, Leander D. L. Anderegg, Elijah Allan, Demetrios Gatziolis, Dar Roberts, Rosie Yacoub, Ramakrishna R. Nemani

Abstract

Biogeographic history can set initial conditions for vegetation community assemblages that determine their climate responses at broad extents that land surface models attempt to forecast. Numerous studies have indicated that evolutionarily conserved biochemical, structural, and other functional attributes of plant species are captured in visible-to-short wavelength infrared, 400 to 2,500 nm, reflectance properties of vegetation. Here, we present a remotely sensed phylogenetic clustering and an evolutionary framework to accommodate spectra, distributions, and traits. Spectral properties evolutionarily conserved in plants provide the opportunity to spatially aggregate species into lineages (interpreted as "lineage functional types" or LFT) with improved classification accuracy. In this study, we use Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer data from the 2013 Hyperspectral Infrared Imager campaign over the southern Sierra Nevada, California flight box, to investigate the potential for incorporating evolutionary thinking into landcover classification. We link the airborne hyperspectral data with vegetation plot data from 1372 surveys and a phylogeny representing 1,572 species. Despite temporal and spatial differences in our training data, we classified plant lineages with moderate reliability (Kappa = 0.76) and overall classification accuracy of 80.9%. We present an assessment of classification error and detail study limitations to facilitate future LFT development. This work demonstrates that lineage-based methods may be a promising way to leverage the new-generation high-resolution and high return-interval hyperspectral data planned for the forthcoming satellite missions with sparsely sampled existing ground-based ecological data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 45%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#16,740,371
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#91,769
of 101,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,428
of 365,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#205
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.