↓ Skip to main content

Perfluorinated Compounds in the Groundwater in Tokyo and their Behavior in Soils during Leaching Experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Chemistry, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perfluorinated Compounds in the Groundwater in Tokyo and their Behavior in Soils during Leaching Experiments
Published in
Journal of Environmental Chemistry, January 2015
DOI 10.5985/jec.25.149
Authors

Takahiro NISHINO, Mika KATO, Shisei SHIMOMA, Masaru KITANO

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#15,643,974
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Chemistry
#34
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,036
of 360,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Chemistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them