↓ Skip to main content

ガラスと金属の封着の機構

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Ceramic Association, Japan, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 115)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ガラスと金属の封着の機構
Published in
Journal of the Ceramic Association, Japan, April 2010
DOI 10.2109/jcersj1950.72.818_c51
Authors

池田 豊

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Ceramic Association, Japan
#13
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,908
of 105,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Ceramic Association, Japan
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.