↓ Skip to main content

Roles of climatic and anthropogenic factors in shaping Holocene vegetation and fire regimes in Great Dismal Swamp, eastern USA

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Roles of climatic and anthropogenic factors in shaping Holocene vegetation and fire regimes in Great Dismal Swamp, eastern USA
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, July 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2023.108153
Authors

D.A. Willard, M.C. Jones, J. Alder, D. Fastovich, K. Hoefke, R.K. Poirier, F.C. Wurster

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Unknown 9 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#3,048
of 3,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,179
of 370,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#49
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.