↓ Skip to main content

作業療法士が適切と考える高齢者を対象とした急性期作業療法のアウトカム指標の予備的検討 ─フォーカスグループインタビューとノミナルグループテクニックを用いた質的研究─

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Occupational Therapy Research, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
作業療法士が適切と考える高齢者を対象とした急性期作業療法のアウトカム指標の予備的検討 ─フォーカスグループインタビューとノミナルグループテクニックを用いた質的研究─
Published in
Japanese Occupational Therapy Research, June 2023
DOI 10.32178/jotr.42.3_299
Authors

本田 拓也, 谷村 厚子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Occupational Therapy Research
#142
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,434
of 385,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Occupational Therapy Research
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.