The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Water quality parameters assessment of Ras El-Ain Natural Ponds, Tyr, Lebanon
|
---|---|
Published in |
Water Science & Technology: Water Supply, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.2166/ws.2023.140 |
Authors |
Milad Khatib, Mohamad Daoud, Wahib Arairo, Marianne Saba, Hussein Mortada |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 2 | 25% |
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,859,305
of 26,173,059 outputs
Outputs from Water Science & Technology: Water Supply
#52
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,162
of 393,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Science & Technology: Water Supply
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,173,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them