The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A SEDIMENT RESUSPENSION AND WATER QUALITY MODEL OF LAKE OKEECHOBEE1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Water Resources Association, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb03540.x |
| Authors |
R. Thomas. James, James Martin, Tim Wool, P F Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 18% |
| Engineering | 3 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2015.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Water Resources Association
#184
of 1,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,896
of 82,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Water Resources Association
#52
of 528 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 528 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.