↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Landscape Composition and Wetland Fragmentation on Frog and Toad Abundance and Species Richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
257 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
449 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Landscape Composition and Wetland Fragmentation on Frog and Toad Abundance and Species Richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Published in
Conservation Biology, December 2001
DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98445.x
Authors

Melinda G. Knutson, John R. Sauer, Douglas A. Olsen, Michael J. Mossman, Lisa M. Hemesath, Michael J. Lannoo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 18 4%
United States 14 3%
Mexico 4 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 395 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 102 23%
Student > Master 90 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 17%
Student > Bachelor 38 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 6%
Other 71 16%
Unknown 44 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 249 55%
Environmental Science 116 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 55 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2005.
All research outputs
#5,246,316
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#2,022
of 3,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,485
of 129,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#69
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.