The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Self‐Organized Stick Insect‐Like Locomotion under Decentralized Adaptive Neural Control: From Biological Investigation to Robot Simulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
ADVANCED THEORY AND SIMULATIONS, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/adts.202300228 |
Authors |
Alexander Dupond Larsen, Thies H. Büscher, Thirawat Chuthong, Thipawan Pairam, Hendrik Bethge, Stanislav N. Gorb, Poramate Manoonpong |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
Engineering | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,594,947
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from ADVANCED THEORY AND SIMULATIONS
#21
of 298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,732
of 386,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADVANCED THEORY AND SIMULATIONS
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them