↓ Skip to main content

栄養と運動の併用効果のメカニズム

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Therapy Japan, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 301)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
栄養と運動の併用効果のメカニズム
Published in
Physical Therapy Japan, June 2023
DOI 10.15063/rigaku.50-3kikaku_tatematsu_noriatsu
Authors

立松 典篤

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,195,999
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Physical Therapy Japan
#15
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,764
of 385,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Therapy Japan
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them