The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using state-and-transition simulation models to scope post-fire success in restoring greater sage-grouse habitat
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecological Modelling, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110396 |
Authors |
Elizabeth K. Orning, Julie A. Heinrichs, David A. Pyke, Peter S. Coates, Cameron L. Aldridge |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 40% |
Researcher | 3 | 30% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 30% |
Mathematics | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,819,305
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Modelling
#578
of 2,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,885
of 355,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Modelling
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,365 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.