↓ Skip to main content

Traumatic Triceps Tendon Avulsion in a Dog: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Surgical Management Evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traumatic Triceps Tendon Avulsion in a Dog: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Surgical Management Evaluation
Published in
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, May 2013
DOI 10.1292/jvms.12-0464
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hun-Young YOON, Soon-Wuk JEONG

Abstract

We report here the clinical presentation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and successful surgical management associated with triceps tendon avulsion in a dog. A definitive diagnosis of triceps tendon avulsion was made based on MRI with evidence of displacement of the triceps tendon. Surgical correction of triceps tendon avulsion was performed with two horizontal mattress sutures using polyester and two tunnels drilled in the olecranon to reattach the tendon to the proximal olecranon. At 9 months, there was no evidence of lameness on the left thoracic limb. This is the first case report to describe MRI evaluation for the diagnosis of the triceps tendon avulsion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 31%
Other 6 19%
Researcher 4 13%
Lecturer 2 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 16 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#2,042
of 3,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,763
of 207,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#18
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.