The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Energy Saving Optimization of Chilled Water System Based on Improved Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.1115/1.4062359 |
Authors |
Zengxi Feng, Wenjing Wang, Xin He, Gangting Li, Lutong Zhang, Weipeng Xiang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#15,052,231
of 26,171,302 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
#25
of 124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,998
of 397,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,171,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.