The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Electrofusion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Islet Cells for Diabetes Therapy: A Rat Model
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0064499 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Goichi Yanai, Takashi Hayashi, Qi Zhi, Kai-Chiang Yang, Yasumasa Shirouzu, Takashi Shimabukuro, Akihito Hiura, Kazutomo Inoue, Shoichiro Sumi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 49 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 21% |
Researcher | 9 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 21% |
Engineering | 4 | 8% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,537,464
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,956
of 193,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,641
of 195,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#800
of 4,758 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,758 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.