The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nimbya scirpicola Causing Orange Stem Spot on Eleocharis kuroguwai
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Phytopathology, January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.3186/jjphytopath.58.766 |
| Authors |
Yukio HARADA, Seiko IMAIZUMI, Hiroshi TANAKA, Hideaki NEGISHI, Takane FUJIMORI, Masao YAMADA, Ryoso HONKURA, Yoshio MIURA |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#21,535,479
of 26,433,695 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Phytopathology
#139
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,473
of 62,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Phytopathology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,433,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.