You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
慢性疼痛の多面的評価 : 治療対象の明確化のために(シンポジウム:慢性疼痛の基礎と臨床,2008年,第49回日本心身医学会総会(札幌))
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.15064/jjpm.49.8_885 |
| Authors |
細井 昌子, 久保 千春 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#20,552,825
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
#256
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,245
of 332,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
#168
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.