The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Closing the gap between science and management of cold‐water refuges in rivers and streams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.16844 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francine H. Mejia, Valerie Ouellet, Martin A. Briggs, Stephanie M. Carlson, Roser Casas‐Mulet, Mollie Chapman, Mathias J. Collins, Stephen J. Dugdale, Joseph L. Ebersole, Danielle M. Frechette, Aimee H. Fullerton, Carole‐Anne Gillis, Zachary C. Johnson, Christa Kelleher, Barret L. Kurylyk, Rebecca Lave, Benjamin H. Letcher, Knut M. Myrvold, Tracie‐Lynn Nadeau, Helen Neville, Herve Piégay, Kathryn A. Smith, Diego Tonolla, Christian E. Torgersen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 48% |
| Scientists | 12 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,499,259
of 26,383,519 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#1,841
of 6,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,428
of 372,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#41
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,519 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.