The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identifying Heavy-Hitter Flows from Sampled Flow Statistics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IEICE Transactions on Communications, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ietcom/e90-b.11.3061 |
| Authors |
MORI Tatsuya, Tetsuya TAKINE, PAN Jianping, Ryoichi KAWAHARA, Masato UCHIDA, GOTO Shigeki |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 33% |
| Professor | 2 | 22% |
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 6 | 67% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from IEICE Transactions on Communications
#165
of 472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,859
of 89,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEICE Transactions on Communications
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 472 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.