↓ Skip to main content

専門知の協同化のためのコンテンツ,メディア,ビジネスを求めて -学術電子書籍の問題点と可能性を検討する実験から

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
専門知の協同化のためのコンテンツ,メディア,ビジネスを求めて -学術電子書籍の問題点と可能性を検討する実験から
Published in
Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, January 2017
DOI 10.18919/jkg.67.1_8
Authors

鈴木 哲也

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#21,381,047
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#494
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,749
of 426,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.