The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ミオームボーラーを2本用いて経肛門的に摘出した直腸異物(瓜)の1例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons), December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.4030/jjcs.45.830 |
| Authors |
關口 奈緒子, 池永 雅一, 池上 真理子, 家出 清継, 上田 正射, 津田 雄二郎, 中島 慎介, 谷田 司, 松山 仁, 山田 晃正 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 20% |
| Niger | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,185,891
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons)
#2
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,332
of 521,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them