The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Towards elimination of cervical cancer – human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and cervical cancer screening in Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance (ANCCA) member countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100860 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sok King Ong, Sarah K. Abe, Shyamala Thilagaratnam, Rei Haruyama, Ruchi Pathak, Harindra Jayasekara, Kayo Togawa, Aliza K.C. Bhandari, Abhishek Shankar, Ashrafun Nessa, Uranbolor Jugder, Julyanti Agustina, Mohammed Biglari, Aasim Yusuf, Ugyen Tshomo, Eshani Fernando, Clarito Cairo, Kyaw Kan Kaung, Beauta Rath, Champadeng Vongdala, Kishore Kumar Pradhananga, Jeongseon Kim, Youn Kyung Chung, Tran Thi Thanh Huong, Suleeporn Sangrajran, Yawei Zhang, Partha Basu, Yin Ling Woo, Babu Sukumaran, William Y.K. Hwang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | 7% |
United States | 3 | 7% |
Turkmenistan | 1 | 2% |
Philippines | 1 | 2% |
Singapore | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 33 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 38 | 86% |
Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 11 | 15% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Researcher | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 39 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 12 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 40 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,166,011
of 26,186,522 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
#115
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,146
of 366,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
#7
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,186,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.