The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Simple and Rapid HPLC Method for Quantification of Histidine-Containing Dipeptides, Anserine and Carnosine, in Animal Extracts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.3136/nskkk.51.87 |
| Authors |
Nobuya Yanai, Shigenobu Shiotani, Masayuki Mizuno, Hiroshi Nabetani, Mitsutoshi Nakajima |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Other | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,721,259
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#59
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,646
of 145,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.