The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phase I Study of EST, a New Thiol Protease Inhibitor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rinsho yakuri/Japanese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1985
|
| DOI | 10.3999/jscpt.16.357 |
| Authors |
Tadashi MIYAHARA, Sadatomo SHIMOJO, Keizo TOYOHARA, IMAI Takeo, Masayuki MIYAJIMA, Hidehiko HONDA, Masahiro KAMEGAI, Masahiro OHZEKI, Jun KOKATSU |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Rinsho yakuri/Japanese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
#18
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,392
of 39,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rinsho yakuri/Japanese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.