↓ Skip to main content

Effect of free-weight vs. machine-based strength training on maximal strength, hypertrophy and jump performance – a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 755)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
76 X users
video
11 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of free-weight vs. machine-based strength training on maximal strength, hypertrophy and jump performance – a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, August 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13102-023-00713-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus E. Haugen, Fredrik T. Vårvik, Stian Larsen, Arvid S. Haugen, Roland van den Tillaar, Thomas Bjørnsen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 2 3%
Researcher 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 31 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 26 41%
Unspecified 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 33 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#552,269
of 26,586,231 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#21
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,373
of 366,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,586,231 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.