↓ Skip to main content

Basic evaluation of new dry-type reagent for prothrombin time

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Medical Technology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Basic evaluation of new dry-type reagent for prothrombin time
Published in
Japanese Journal of Medical Technology, January 2014
DOI 10.5833/jamt.13-38
Authors

Yasunori KUROKI, Akiko TSUZUKU, Minoru TANAKA, Shinji OOE, Mayuko ISHII, Masayoshi KIKUCHI

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#20,220,707
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Medical Technology
#92
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,038
of 317,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Medical Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them