You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating the use of two-dimensional OSL laser scanning instruments and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy for OSL exposure dating
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part D: Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.radmeas.2023.106999 |
| Authors |
Tristan Bench, David Sanderson, James Feathers, Emily Warfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#17,881,371
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part D: Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements
#381
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,840
of 361,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part D: Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.