The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Moths of the Rice Leaf Roller, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis GUENÉE, and the Hawaiian Beet Webworm, Hymenia recurvalis FABRICIUS, Found on Seashore Vegetation during the Summer and Autumn
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, January 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1303/jjaez.34.21 |
| Authors |
Yoshio MIYAHARA |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#19,833,166
of 24,373,273 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#144
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,796
of 60,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,373,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them