The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Flesh Without Blood: The Public Health Benefits of Lab‐Grown Meat
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11673-023-10254-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonny Anomaly, Heather Browning, Diana Fleischman, Walter Veit |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 21 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
Scientists | 5 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,191,550
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#39
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,155
of 361,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.