The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
琵琶湖における淡水エビ類に外部寄生するエビノコバン(等脚目:ニセウオノエ科)における生息環境利用と季節性
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer (0008543X), September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.18988/cancer.32.0_1 |
| Authors |
太田 悠造 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 9% |
| Solomon Islands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 94% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,767,851
of 26,561,175 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#1,458
of 14,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,546
of 365,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#20
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,561,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.