The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 575 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enhancing the immunogenicity of lipid-nanoparticle mRNA vaccines by adjuvanting the ionizable lipid and the mRNA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biomedical Engineering, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41551-023-01082-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bowen Li, Allen Yujie Jiang, Idris Raji, Caroline Atyeo, Theresa M. Raimondo, Akiva G. R. Gordon, Luke H. Rhym, Tahoura Samad, Corina MacIsaac, Jacob Witten, Haseeb Mughal, Taras M. Chicz, Yue Xu, Ryan P. McNamara, Sangeeta Bhatia, Galit Alter, Robert Langer, Daniel G. Anderson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Algeria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 513 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 479 | 83% |
| Scientists | 52 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 421. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2024.
All research outputs
#73,810
of 26,582,041 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#32
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,476
of 365,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,582,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.