The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Monstrosity in Medical Science: Race-Making and Teratology in the Nineteenth-Century United States
|
---|---|
Published in |
Isis: Journal of the History of Science in Society, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.1086/726315 |
Authors |
Miriam Rich |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
Other | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#576,548
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Isis: Journal of the History of Science in Society
#9
of 2,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,757
of 361,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Isis: Journal of the History of Science in Society
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.