↓ Skip to main content

Washed microbiota transplantation for Clostridioides difficile infection: A national multicenter real‐world study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Digestive Diseases, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 449)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Washed microbiota transplantation for Clostridioides difficile infection: A national multicenter real‐world study
Published in
Journal of Digestive Diseases, October 2023
DOI 10.1111/1751-2980.13227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xia Wu, Ru Jun Ai, Jie Xu, Quan Wen, Hua Qin Pan, Zhi Hua Zhang, Wang Ning, Ying Fang, Da Fa Ding, Quan Wang, Shuang Han, Xiao Liu, Mei Wu, Zhen Yu Jia, Song Jia, Tao Lin, Bo Ta Cui, Yong Zhan Nie, Xin Wang, Fa Ming Zhang

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been recommended for treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of washed microbiota transplantation (WMT), a new method of FMT, for CDI across various medical settings. This real-world cohort study included CDI patients from multiple centers who underwent WMT. The primary outcome was the clinical cure rate of CDI within 8-week post-WMT. Secondary outcomes included the reduction in total abdominal symptom score (TASS), CDI recurrence rate, and safety during follow-up period. Overall, 90.7% (49/54) of patients achieved clinical cure within 8-week post-WMT. The cure rate for severe and complicated CDI (ScCDI) (n = 30) was 83.3%, and it reached 100% for non-ScCDI (n = 24, p = 0.059). No difference was observed in the clinical cure rate between patients with primary CDI and recurrent CDI (91.89% vs. 88.23%, p = 0.645). One-week post-WMT, the TASS showed a remarkable decrease compared to that before WMT (p < 0.001). 8.16% of patients (4/49) suffered CDI recurrence during follow-up. A WHO performance score of 4, age ≥ 65, higher TASS score, and higher Charlson comorbidity index score (p = 0.018, 0.03, 0.01, 0.034, respectively) were potential risk factors for efficacy. Four transient adverse events related to WMT (3.8%, 4/105) were observed. This study emphasizes the attractive value of WMT for CDI. Early WMT might be a recommendation for CDI, especially for those in serious condition or with complex comorbidities for decreasing deterioration, medical costs, and pain. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,442,435
of 24,573,729 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digestive Diseases
#13
of 449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,961
of 174,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digestive Diseases
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,573,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 449 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them