The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 184 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of Exercise Interventions for Preventing Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.2519/jospt.2023.12063 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florian Teichert, Vera Karner, Rebekka Döding, Tobias Saueressig, Patrick J Owen, Daniel L Belavy |
| Abstract |
OBJECTIVE: To update the evidence on the effectiveness of exercise interventions to prevent episodes of neck pain. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PEDro and trial registries from inception to December 2, 2022. Forward and backward citation searches. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled adults without neck pain at baseline and compared exercise interventions to no intervention, placebo/ sham, attention control or minimal intervention. Military populations and astronauts were excluded. DATA SYNTHESIS: Random effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The certainty of evidence was judged according to the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Of 4703 records screened, 5 trials (1722 participants at baseline) were included and eligible for meta-analysis. Most (80%) participants were office workers. Risk of bias was rated as some concerns for 2 trials and high for 3 trials. There was moderate certainty evidence that exercise interventions probably reduce the risk of a new episode of neck pain (OR 0.49, 95%CI 0.31 to 0.76) compared to no or minimal intervention in the short-term (≤ 12 months). The results were not robust to sensitivity analyses for missing outcome data. CONCLUSION: There was moderate certainty evidence supporting exercise interventions for reducing the risk for an episode of neck pain in the next 12 months. The clinical significance of the effect is unclear. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 155 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 141 | 77% |
| Scientists | 32 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 185. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#231,008
of 26,552,141 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#65
of 2,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,220
of 369,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,552,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.