↓ Skip to main content

ケプストラム解析による音響分析の有用性 ―エビデンスと今後の展望―

Overview of attention for article published in The Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 153)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ケプストラム解析による音響分析の有用性 ―エビデンスと今後の展望―
Published in
The Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, August 2021
DOI 10.5112/jjlp.62.186
Authors

水田 匡信, 土師 知行, 阿部 千佳

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,400,366
of 26,522,772 outputs
Outputs from The Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics
#20
of 153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,570
of 440,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,522,772 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 153 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them