↓ Skip to main content

欧米における青いケシのイメージとチベット医学: 植物のイメージ人類学

Overview of attention for article published in Ritsumeikan Annual Review of Asia-Japan Research, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
欧米における青いケシのイメージとチベット医学: 植物のイメージ人類学
Published in
Ritsumeikan Annual Review of Asia-Japan Research, September 2023
DOI 10.34389/ritsumeikanasiajapan.4.0_20
Authors

長岡 慶

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#16,376,857
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Ritsumeikan Annual Review of Asia-Japan Research
#5
of 11 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,369
of 357,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ritsumeikan Annual Review of Asia-Japan Research
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.