The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vulnerability to climate change of United States marine mammal stocks in the western North Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0290643 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew D. Lettrich, Michael J. Asaro, Diane L. Borggaard, Dorothy M. Dick, Roger B. Griffis, Jenny A. Litz, Christopher D. Orphanides, Debra L. Palka, Melissa S. Soldevilla, Brian Balmer, Samuel Chavez, Danielle Cholewiak, Diane Claridge, Ruth Y. Ewing, Kristi L. Fazioli, Dagmar Fertl, Erin M. Fougeres, Damon Gannon, Lance Garrison, James Gilbert, Annie Gorgone, Aleta Hohn, Stacey Horstman, Beth Josephson, Robert D. Kenney, Jeremy J. Kiszka, Katherine Maze-Foley, Wayne McFee, Keith D. Mullin, Kimberly Murray, Daniel E. Pendleton, Jooke Robbins, Jason J. Roberts, Grisel Rodriguez- Ferrer, Errol I. Ronje, Patricia E. Rosel, Todd Speakman, Joy E. Stanistreet, Tara Stevens, Megan Stolen, Reny Tyson Moore, Nicole L. Vollmer, Randall Wells, Heidi R. Whitehead, Amy Whitt |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2552. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,067
of 26,154,283 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30
of 228,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69
of 361,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1
of 5,653 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,154,283 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 228,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,653 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.