The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
カブトムシによる樹液獲得のためのトネリコ樹皮の傷つけ
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tohoku Journal of Forest Science, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.18982/tjfs.19.2_63 |
| Authors |
八木橋 勉, 齋藤 智之, 前原 紀敏, 野口 麻穂子 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,769,110
of 26,385,958 outputs
Outputs from Tohoku Journal of Forest Science
#2
of 8 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,146
of 332,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tohoku Journal of Forest Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,385,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them