↓ Skip to main content

Inequalities in cyberspace?: An exploration of racial and ethnic differences in gynecologic cancer content on TikTok (2131)

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecologic Oncology, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inequalities in cyberspace?: An exploration of racial and ethnic differences in gynecologic cancer content on TikTok (2131)
Published in
Gynecologic Oncology, September 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.06.256
Authors

Molly Morton, Wafa Khadraoui, Paulina Haight, Floor Backes, Kristin Bixel, David O'Malley, Christa Nagel, Roberto Vargas, Laura Chambers

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,364,546
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Gynecologic Oncology
#113
of 4,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,571
of 353,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecologic Oncology
#2
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.