The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as a diagnostic tool for pseudophakic cystoid macular edema
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Ophthalmology, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.1177/11206721231199119 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gilad Rabina, Chen Shtayer, Rachel Shemesh, Michael Mimouni, Orly Gal-Or, Arie Y. Nemet, Noa Geffen, Ori Segal |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,622,740
of 24,546,092 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Ophthalmology
#48
of 1,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,357
of 176,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Ophthalmology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,546,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them