↓ Skip to main content

「人間としての在り方生き方」の「中核的な指導の場面」としての特別活動の課題

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of JASEA, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「人間としての在り方生き方」の「中核的な指導の場面」としての特別活動の課題
Published in
Journal of JASEA, March 2022
DOI 10.51044/tokkatsu.27.0_13
Authors

及川 良一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,693,357
of 24,552,012 outputs
Outputs from Journal of JASEA
#3
of 4 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,593
of 434,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of JASEA
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,552,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.