↓ Skip to main content

Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Occurring after Craniotomy for Brain Tumor Biopsy Mimicking Postoperative Bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in NMC Case Report Journal, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Occurring after Craniotomy for Brain Tumor Biopsy Mimicking Postoperative Bleeding
Published in
NMC Case Report Journal, September 2023
DOI 10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joji Inamasu, Masashi Fujisawa, Mizuto Sato

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2023.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from NMC Case Report Journal
#55
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,687
of 353,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NMC Case Report Journal
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.