The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rudimentary Sympathy in Preverbal Infants: Preference for Others in Distress
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0065292 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasuhiro Kanakogi, Yuko Okumura, Yasuyuki Inoue, Michiteru Kitazaki, Shoji Itakura |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 20 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 86 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Scientists | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 23% |
| Unknown | 14 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 78 | 61% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#184,923
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,732
of 231,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,096
of 212,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#62
of 4,635 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,635 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.