↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 on Voice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 on Voice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, September 2023
DOI 10.1159/000534271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdul-Latif Hamdan, Christophe Abi Zeid Daou, Jad Hosri, Patrick Abou Raji Feghali, Christopher Jabbour, Elie Alam, Marc Mourad

Abstract

Diabetes Mellitus type 2 is a growing health concern that affects several systems in the body among which the phonatory apparatus. Voice may be affected in view of the high prevalence of myopathy and neuropathy in diseased subjects. The authors aim to answer the following question: Does type 2 diabetes have an effect on voice? The systematic review included search terms such as "speech, voice, larynx, glucose, diabetes, and hyperglycemia". The search strategy yielded 221 articles, only five of which satisfied the inclusion criteria. Articles were considered for inclusion using the PRISMA method. Analysis included 321 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 171 controls. All studies included were case control studies except for one study which was an observational cohort. Six parameters were chosen as endpoints for the systematic review and meta-analysis: the presence/absence of voice complaints, fundamental frequency (fo), jitter, shimmer, noise to harmonic ratio (NHR) and maximum phonation time. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of voice complaints (i.e., hoarseness) between diabetic patients and control groups. There was also no significant difference in any of the acoustic and aerodynamic measures between patients with type 2 diabetes and controls. These findings can be ascribed the high resilience of the laryngeal muscles to the adverse effect of systemic diseases. There is no consensus in the literature that the prevalence of voice symptoms in diabetic patients is significantly higher than that reported in healthy subjects.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#15,905,296
of 25,171,799 outputs
Outputs from Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
#154
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,387
of 343,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,171,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.