↓ Skip to main content

A radiocarbon spike at 14300calyrBP in subfossil trees provides the impulse response function of the global carbon cycle during the Late Glacial

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 3,729)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
149 news outlets
blogs
16 blogs
twitter
324 X users
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A radiocarbon spike at 14300calyrBP in subfossil trees provides the impulse response function of the global carbon cycle during the Late Glacial
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences, October 2023
DOI 10.1098/rsta.2022.0206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edouard Bard, Ccile Miramont, Manuela Capano, Frdric Guibal, Christian Marschal, Frauke Rostek, Thibaut Tuna, Yoann Fagault, Timothy J. Heaton

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 324 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 18%
Environmental Science 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1448. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2024.
All research outputs
#9,023
of 26,811,559 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences
#1
of 3,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212
of 372,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,811,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.