The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 950 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A comprehensive SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 review, Part 2: host extracellular to systemic effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Human Genetics, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41431-023-01462-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S. Anand Narayanan, David A. Jamison, Joseph W. Guarnieri, Victoria Zaksas, Michael Topper, Andrew P. Koutnik, Jiwoon Park, Kevin B. Clark, Francisco J. Enguita, Ana Lúcia Leitão, Saswati Das, Pedro M. Moraes-Vieira, Diego Galeano, Christopher E. Mason, Nídia S. Trovão, Robert E. Schwartz, Jonathan C. Schisler, Jordana G. A. Coelho-dos-Reis, Eve Syrkin Wurtele, Afshin Beheshti |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 22 | 2% |
Germany | 6 | <1% |
Austria | 6 | <1% |
Finland | 5 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
India | 3 | <1% |
Canada | 3 | <1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Other | 13 | 1% |
Unknown | 884 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 784 | 83% |
Scientists | 93 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 56 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 8% |
Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 21% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 30 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 390. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#83,977
of 26,588,548 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#9
of 3,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,465
of 376,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,548 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.