↓ Skip to main content

ヘルスコーチングの展望:コーチングの歴史と課題を基に

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Assisting Dialogue and Communication Studies, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ヘルスコーチングの展望:コーチングの歴史と課題を基に
Published in
Journal of Assisting Dialogue and Communication Studies, January 2018
DOI 10.20761/jadcs.1.0_7
Authors

西垣 悦代

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,891,409
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisting Dialogue and Communication Studies
#2
of 7 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,038
of 455,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisting Dialogue and Communication Studies
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.