↓ Skip to main content

Randomized, Double-Blind Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Apixaban With Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome in Japanese Patients (APPRAISE-J)

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized, Double-Blind Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Apixaban With Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome in Japanese Patients (APPRAISE-J)
Published in
Circulation Journal, June 2013
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0209
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hisao Ogawa, Shinya Goto, Masunori Matsuzaki, Shintaro Hiro, Daisuke Shima, on behalf of the APPRAISE-J investigators

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 55%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 19 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#514
of 2,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,780
of 209,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.