The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of laser powder bed fusion processing on the cyclic and fatigue properties of Ni20Cr alloy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Materials Science & Engineering: A, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.msea.2023.145915 |
Authors |
Shubham Sanjay Joshi, Williams Lefebvre, Yan Duval, Cendrine Folton, Eric Hug, Marina Fazzini, Clément Keller |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 40% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
India | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 80% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,405,017
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from Materials Science & Engineering: A
#496
of 2,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,756
of 386,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials Science & Engineering: A
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,621 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them