The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Community recommendations on cryoEM data archiving and validation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IUCrJ, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1107/s2052252524001246 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerard J. Kleywegt, Paul D. Adams, Sarah J. Butcher, Catherine L. Lawson, Alexis Rohou, Peter B. Rosenthal, Sriram Subramaniam, Maya Topf, Sanja Abbott, Philip R. Baldwin, John M. Berrisford, Gérard Bricogne, Preeti Choudhary, Tristan I. Croll, Radostin Danev, Sai J. Ganesan, Timothy Grant, Aleksandras Gutmanas, Richard Henderson, J. Bernard Heymann, Juha T. Huiskonen, Andrei Istrate, Takayuki Kato, Gabriel C. Lander, Shee-Mei Lok, Steven J. Ludtke, Garib N. Murshudov, Ryan Pye, Grigore D. Pintilie, Jane S. Richardson, Carsten Sachse, Osman Salih, Sjors H. W. Scheres, Gunnar F. Schroeder, Carlos Oscar S. Sorzano, Scott M. Stagg, Zhe Wang, Rangana Warshamanage, John D. Westbrook, Martyn D. Winn, Jasmine Y. Young, Stephen K. Burley, Jeffrey C. Hoch, Genji Kurisu, Kyle Morris, Ardan Patwardhan, Sameer Velankar |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 83 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 59% |
| Scientists | 36 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#822,257
of 26,526,880 outputs
Outputs from IUCrJ
#15
of 997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,655
of 393,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IUCrJ
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,526,880 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.